Ex-AIT Chairman, Dokpesi’s U.S. Visa Revoked Over Looters List


The erstwhile chairman of media conglomerate-DAAR Communications Plc, Chief Aleogho Raymond Dokpesi’s United States (U.S.) visa has been revoked following claims by the Presidency that he was part of the people who looted the country, during the last government.
The media mogul, as a result of this has sued Minister of Information and Culture Alhaji Lai Mohammed, from whom originated the much celebrated ‘looter’s list’. Dr. Dokpsi is seeking payment of N5billion damages.
No date has been fixed for hearing the suit filed on Monday before the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory.
He is seeking N5billion damages for alleged defamation of character.
Dokpesi said the defendants allegedly sent his name as a looter to the United States Embassy, which in turn notified him on March 16 that his visa had been revoked.
The US Embassy, he said, told him it was because his name was among a looters list submitted to it by the Federal Government.
The plaintiff said the publication of his name as a looter was malicious since he has not been convicted by any court of competent jurisdiction.
Dokpesi prayed that the retraction and apology to him be published both in the social media and in newspaper and televisions stations.
He is also praying for an order compelling the defendants, including Attorney-General of the Federation Abubakar Malami (SAN), to publish a full retraction of the defamatory publications and to apologise to him.
In the suit by his lawyer Chief Mike Ozekhome (SAN), Dokpesi is also praying for a perpetual injunction restraining the defendants or their agents from further making any defamatory publications against him, and N50million as cost of the action.
The publications, he said, have prejudiced his constitutionally guaranteed rights to presumption of innocence until proven guilty, and that his right to fair hearing as enshrined in the Constitution has been blatantly violated.
“The defendants’ defamatory publications are malicious and calculated to overreach and prejudice my fair trial and for purposes of stampeding and cowing the court to convict me at all cost by agreeing with the defendants’ skewed position,” the plaintiff said.
Source

TAG